UK: Poor hospital care ‘killing 1000 NHS patients a month’

Poor hospital care 'needlessly killing 1000 NHS patients a month'

Almost 1,000 patients are needlessly dying in NHS hospitals each month as a result of poor patient care, a new study has found.

Researchers concluded that blundering medical staff committed basic errors in more than one in 10 cases, in which a patient died.

The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine study, one of the most detailed surveys of hospital deaths ever undertaken, found that all the deaths were preventable.

But the new study, published online in BMJ’s Quality and Safety journal, concluded that mistakes occurred because hospital staff made wrong diagnosis or gave out wrong drugs.

In some cases they failed to adequately monitor patients – such as failing to check a pulse or blood pressure – or react when their condition deteriorated.

The study found that something went wrong with the care of 13 per cent of the patients who died in hospitals.

An error only led to a death in 5.2 per cent of these cases, which was the equivalent to nearly 12,000 preventable deaths in hospitals in England every year.

It found that errors of omission were more frequent than active mistakes.

Dr Helen Hogan, who led the study, said: “We found medical staff were not doing the basics well enough – monitoring blood pressure and kidney function, for example.

“They were also not assessing patients holistically early enough in their admission so they didn’t miss any underlying condition. And they were not checking side effects … before prescribing drugs.”

“Hospitals must learn from careful analysis of preventable deaths and make every effort to avoid [them].”

She added to the Independent: “The NHS in the future is going to have to look after very frail elderly patients as their numbers increase. Our systems are not robust enough to ensure we avoid harming them.”

The study, based on analysis of 1,000 deaths at 10 NHS trusts during 2009, found that most of the patients who died were elderly and frail and suffering from multiple conditions although some were aged in their 30s and 40s.

 

Telegraph has the full article

You may also like...